|
Home Page
Governance
Policy Governance® Services
Articles and White Papers
Values & Ethics
Performance
Improvement
Clinical Office High Performance
Safety
Strategy
System
Dynamics & Modeling
Measurement
& Analysis
Our Analytical Tools
Organizational
Development
Training
and Seminars
About
Us
Contact us
|
|

Board Governance
Satisfied
with your board governance process ?
Getting It Right
All
things organizational start with governance
From the board policy level
flows ethics and values, organizational purpose, vision, mission, and the framework for strategy.
The
basic frame, or screen, through which The BroadBaker Group assesses
organizational performance is composed of three cardinal elements,
strategy, quality, and execution of the fundamentals. However, in the
center of this leadership model, or frame, sits governance. Out of
governance flows the values & ethics, vision, mission and policies that drive how
well the organization does its fundamentals, its strategy, and its
product or service quality. Board governance can be defined as establishing, assuring and
overseeing the purpose(s) of an organization, and the achievement of
those purposes on behalf of owners (actual or moral), while assuring the
avoidance of the undesirable. It is sometimes called "the purposing
function." The board, as a group, is accountable for the governance of the
organization, and as such, it has total accountability for, and
authority over, the organization. This is a weighty
responsibility.
The
necessity for a high performance board
A
high performance organization must have a high performance governance
mechanism. The board must know how to govern through the use of
policies, not intrusive methodological directives or, on the other hand,
passive approvals of Management initiatives.
Furthermore, it must not violate the integrity and coherence between
authority and accountability required for effectiveness. And, it
must monitor responsibly, closing the loop of
accountability.
...And
its rarity
Unfortunately,
most boards do not function well, even though good, even very smart,
well meaning, and
experienced, people serve. Boards frequently seem to err either by
over-managing (or micromanaging), (or they use their committees to do
the same), constantly second guessing the CEO, or
they swing the other way and become passive, “advisory” in style,
and response-based to CEO initiatives, rubber-stamping CEO requests and
actions. Or they vacillate along from one style to the other,
governing-by-asking-questions, not
feeling good about how they are governing and not knowing why. They may
possibly even be adversarial with the CEO, a broken governance system.
CEOs,
on the other hand, often feel the board is a necessary bother that must be
"managed" (euphemistically termed "leading") or manipulated, spoon
fed information, and controlled. Neither is correct nor healthy. Neither
these boards nor their CEOs have a clear idea of the proper role and
conduct of the board, although they may desire excellence in governance.
Neither is much (or most) of the board governance literature
particularly helpful, often setting ideal "ought to's"
but not telling how to, or simply giving suggestions about
committees, board member "responsibilities," board
size and selection, being a leader (whatever that means at the board level),
"supporting the CEO," (Is that really the board's
job? What about duty to the ownership, real or moral?), or
(just as bad) delving into
or even prescribing organizational processes (as though the
board had more process expertise than Management), and the
like. What, thus, does the board do to merit the term quality
governance? Where to turn?
|Top
of Page|
Our
search for the best
Members
of The BroadBaker Group associates have had extensive experience
concerning boards, their conduct, and productivity. We believe in
governance based on sound values and ethics leading to carefully and thoughtfully board-crafted
policies and then monitoring within a framework or model that does not violate principles of
accountability and authority.
Therefore,
we became convinced that, for many, if not most boards, John Carver's approach to board governance, that
of Policy Governance® is most effective.
Policy Governance is the leading single (we
would say only) comprehensive and coherent system for excellent and highly
effective (and satisfying) board governance. It is not tweaking or
simply adopting some boardroom tips. It is not amalgamating the
"best" of one's opinion of board practices. It is a true methodological shift
in board governance. Consequently, its components cannot be
cherry-picked, and yet provide the same performance. Thousands of boards, worldwide, have
subscribed to, and varyingly adopted Policy
Governance. It has proven adaptable to virtually any type of board. The
closer a board comes to full conformation to the principles the better
it works.
We
not only bring our consulting experience in Policy Governance
but are on and chair Policy Governance boards which are fairly
"pure," and can testify to its power to transform.
Policy
Governance is an integrated system of interdependent principles used by the
governing board: 1.) to coherently link ownership expectations of value
creation, in all its possible diversity, 2.) synthesized by the board
and then, 3.) expressed in sufficiently clear and understandable terminology
(policies) to the organization through the CEO in terms of a.) purposes,
called Ends (specified (who, what and how much) beneficial effects
created in the world outside of the
organization and of value to the owners), while, b.) expressing board
concerns about unwanted actions (means) in terms of proscriptions,
thus 4.) empowering or freeing the CEO to create and manage all other
means to achieve those Ends. 5.) Finally, the board regularly monitors
organizational achievement of Ends and avoidance of proscribed means in
terms both understandable and acceptable to the board, including,
6.) the board's own performance. Thus,
the model maintains the integrity or coherence of accountability from
owners to board to CEO and back. Since it is principle-based it has wide
and flexible applicability to all variety of boards and organizational
structures. (See a slightly longer explanation in our paper
on Policy Governance.)
The
Policy Governance model provides clear, clean and logically satisfying
principles for board governance, accountability, and board self
assessment and improvement. It is also our belief that, done well and
consistently, this system of governance significantly reduces
a board's exposure to charges of nonfeasance and misfeasance.
In the full sense, boards don't truly protect themselves,
in a primary sense,
by buying insurance or even reacting to harmful problems well; they protect themselves
best by proactively doing the right job well.
|Top
of Page|
Our
competency
Dr.
Biery, President of The BroadBaker Group, in addition to his extensive
board knowledge and experience (having served on dozens of boards), is also specifically trained in Policy
Governance and is a graduate of The Carver Academy in Policy Governance.
(There are about 190 graduates, worldwide, and only a minority of those
are consultants.) He is also a full member in the
International Policy Governance Association, one of less
than 50 who have met the requirements, less than half of whom
are consultants.
We
offer governance consulting to boards,
including strategic planning facilitation, but we also offer specific orientation,
in-depth training, and/or implementation training and consulting to
governing boards interested in true Policy Governance and to their
chairs. We can work with a board and
train it in Policy Governance, leading it into a completely different
and much more effective way to govern, a significantly more rewarding
experience for both board and CEO. It clarifies roles, responsibilities,
and accountability processes and measures. We also provide assistance to
boards and chairs concerned about their Board-CEO relationship, including such
areas as CEO performance measurement and management/accountability. We
are particularly equipped because of training and background
to assist and coach in monitoring,
an absolutely vital component of Policy Governance.
We
are also very informed and experienced at the governance
level concerning faith-based organizations such as missions, associations,
churches, colleges, and schools. We are able to provide knowledgeable
governance consulting and Policy Governance support to these
organizations.
We
are able to work in alliance with outstanding leaders and
consultants in the faith community. One outstanding colleague
we team with is Olan Hendrix, well known author,
leader and consultant in leadership, governance, and
development (web site www.olanhendrix.com)
where our combined knowledge and experience brings the client
a synergistic service in values and ethics, governance,
leadership, management and development.
A
Warning
We
feel the need to issue cautionary advice to those organizations
seeking Policy Governance consulting. If you desire to learn
about or change to Policy Governance, always use
a Carver Academy trained consultant. (While there is no
certification in Policy Governance, the Academy is the highest
level of training.) We are aware of several
boards that have hired individuals claiming to have
"studied" Carver and then attempt to consult on
Policy Governance. The consulting is short on knowledge,
possibly misleading, and
not able to provide the depth and power of the model.
Sometimes individuals attempt to
"modify" Policy Governance, again not having had
training, and the results are often combinations of old and
new, muddled, and far less than satisfying. We have worked with such boards in
correcting their new but erroneous practices.
Our
second piece of advice stems from the fact that some
organizations contemplate using an employee who has studied
(and may even be Academy trained) Policy Governance to train the
organization's board. Don't. This employee is at a serious
disadvantage before their employer-board and is not free to
challenge, probe, correct, etc. as must be done when leading a
board through a paradigm change such as is involved here. Use
an independent consultant for at least the initial
implementation training and then, best, get the chairperson
trained to help the board through later situations. Keep a
consultant handy for the chair and the board, but transition
the lead for this role to the chair.
(A
more satisfactory alternative to using an employee is to have
the chair or a board member fully Academy trained. We have
seen that work. However, there remains the issue of
experience.)
(Policy Governance is the registered service mark of John
Carver; the authoritative website for the Policy Governance
model can be found at www.carvergovernance.com.)
[Top
of Page] [Home
Page] [About Us] [Contact
Us]
|