|
Home Page
Governance
Policy Governance® Services
Articles and White Papers
Values & Ethics
Performance
Improvement
Clinical Office High Performance
Safety
Strategy
System
Dynamics & Modeling
Measurement
& Analysis
Our Analytical Tools
Organizational
Development
Training
and Seminars
About
Us
Contact us
|
|
A brief Explanation of
Policy Governance®
Policy
Governance®, the process of board governance
developed by Dr. John Carver, derives logically from the definition of governance
as the
method by which a group with authority and accountability over
an organization, and representing its ownership, coherently
(as a group) expresses its values and expectations to Management in the
form of instructions and sees to it that its expectations are
achieved, so that the organization accomplishes its intended
purpose, producing something of value for its beneficiaries
(what good it creates for others), and
thereby producing ultimate value (tangible or intangible) for the ownership.
In
accomplishing this within Policy Governance, the governance
process contains a fundamental set of principles (seen as
ethics or values) that constrain it. 1.) The board governs as
a group on
behalf of ownership (generally others with a real, moral,
and/or spiritual investment) and owes this ownership quality
and integrity in its governance, including the board
monitoring itself. 2.) In governing on behalf of
ownership the board must understand "the voice of the ownership." 3.) The board
must balance its instructive authority between sufficient
instruction to give strategic direction and prevent undesired
actions while empowering Management. 4.) However the board
conducts its business, it maintains the integrity and
congruity between authority and accountability. From the
above, the Ends/Means distinction for board policies provides
the best logical solution to date meeting criteria for
efficiency and integrity. Means are dealt with by proscribing
unwanted (unapprovable) means and organizational Ends are
expressed by prescribing
desired results the organization is to effect in the world.
(The global End often suffices as the vision statement.) 5.)
The board achieves accountability with fairness and integrity
by monitoring the organization against board written policies
and not values it hasn’t stated. 6.) In order to assure
logical coherence and clarity, policies are developed from
general to specific, which is the natural linguistic manner of
definition.
The development of written policies also constitute the
"voice" of the board, assuring the coherence of
board instructions.
R.
M. Biery, 2002
(A much fuller explanation is provided on the Carver website
as the authoritative website, www.carvergovernance.com.)
[print
friendly version]
(Policy Governance is the registered service mark of John
Carver; the authoritative website for the Policy Governance
model can be found at www.carvergovernance.com.) |